LFS 2002-2003

 Reference ID MNG-NSO-EN-LFS-2002-2003-v2.0 Created on Aug - 31 - 2021
Year 2002 Last modified Apr - 26 - 2026
Country Mongolia Page views 135
Producer(s) National Statistical Office Downloads 0
Collection(s) Labour Force Survey

Overview

Identification

COUNTRY

Mongolia

TITLE

LFS 2002/2003
 

STUDY TYPE

Labor Force Survey [hh/lfs]
 

SERIES INFORMATION

The first time Labour force survey the Mongolian National Statistical Office conducted quarterly in 2002-2003 with financed and technical supported of Asian Development Bank and International Labour Organization. The LFS was conducted in four quarterly rounds from October 2002 through September 2003 to capture seasonal variations in labour supply and demand.
 

ID NUMBER

MNG-NSO-EN-LFS-2002-v1.0

Version

VERSION DESCRIPTION

v2.0- cleaned data file.
 

PRODUCTION DATE

2016-01-19

Overview

ABSTRACT

The Labour Force Survey of Mongolia (LFS) with the Child Activities Module (CAM) 2002-2003 is the first in a series of proposed employment surveys in Mongolia. The LFS is the first sample survey on employment to be undertaken in the country, utilizing internationally used concepts and methods of measuring the economically active population. Labour force survey (LFS), the nucleus of social statistical information is a first large scale survey that has measured the economic activities and employment of the population by two methods (“current” and “usual status” approaches) in conformity with common concepts and definitions and methodologies recommended by International Labour Organization. Labour force survey is especially important in a sense that it elicits comprehensive data on employment patterns and unemployment and provides new and reliable data sources which are useful in addressing the pressing issues in the lives of a society and citizens. LFS is specific in a way that at its early stage, a child activities module was incorporated to have collected a comprehensive and rich source of data on child economic activities and scope and pattern of child work and child labour.
 

KIND OF DATA

Sample survey data [ssd]
 

UNITS OF ANALYSIS

-individuals

-households
 

Scope

NOTES

Coverage

GEOGRAPHIC COVERAGE

The survey is nationally and regionally (5 regions - West, Central, East, South, Ulaanbaatar) representative and covers the whole of Mongolia.
 

UNIVERSE

The survey was designed to interview a representative national sample of about 12,800 households from Ulaanbaatar and urban and rural areas of 4 regions that was deemed sufficient to collect reliable data on employment and unemployment and child labour. At this level of disaggregation the sample would be sufficient to produce estimates of high levels of precision in respect of selected employment characteristics.
 

Producers and Sponsors

PRIMARY INVESTIGATOR(S)

Name Affiliation
National Statistical Office of Mongolia  

OTHER PRODUCER(S)

Name Affiliation Role
Asian Development Bank   Technical assistance in questionnaire design/sampling methodology
International Labour Organization   Technical assistance in questionnaire design/sampling methodology

FUNDING

Name Abbreviation Role
Government of Mongolia GOF  
Asian Development Bank ADB  
International Labour Organization ILO  

OTHER ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Name Affiliation Role
Mr. Raja B. M. Korale ADB Labour Force Survey and Sampling Consultant for assisting the NSO in designing the survey including its sampling design, preparing the draft report of the survey
Mr Bijoy Raychaudhuri Consultant of International Labour Organization /International Programme for Eradication of Child Labour for his expertise assistance in methodology development, data analysis and reporting

Metadata Production

METADATA PRODUCED BY

Name Abbreviation Affiliation Role
Nansalmaa Zundui   NSO Documentation of the study
Daniel Clarke   ESCAP Review documentation of the study

DATE OF METADATA PRODUCTION

2008-05-20

DDI DOCUMENT VERSION

Version 2.0
 

DDI DOCUMENT ID

DDI-MNG-NSO-EN-LFS-2002-v1.0

Sampling

Sampling Procedure
The sampling frame derived from the Census of Population 2000 was used in the survey design. The institutional facilities such as hostels, army barracks, boarding houses, etc. were excluded from the frame and a truncated frame comprising ordinary households was prepared. Considering the socio-economic stratification of the main items canvassed through the survey it was considered that Mongolia should be classified into urban, rural and regional stratifications. Accordingly, Mongolia was divided into urban and rural areas and Ulaanbaatar, Central, East, West and Khangai regions. A two stage stratified random sampling design was adopted with baghs (census enumeration areas) as primary sampling units (PSUs) and households as secondary sampling units (SSUs). The frame which had baghs grouped by district and province in effect provided an implicit stratification for the PSUs for the probability proportional to size systematic random sampling procedure adopted in the selection of the PSUs. In order to capture seasonal variations in labour supply and demand a two stage stratified random sampling design was adopted to enable the preparation of estimates for 9 strata comprising the capital city of Ulaanbaatar, and the urban and rural sectors of the 4 geographic regions into which the country is divided. The survey sampled 3,200 households or more than 12000 persons in each quarter that was sufficiently large for the preparation of statistically reliable estimates on key variables based on the data from the 4 quarterly rounds. The questionnaire was designed to capture labour supply and demand under both currently active and usually active concepts based on a short reference period of 1 week before the survey and a long reference period of one year considering the large proportion of the working population that was engaged in agriculture and livestock production activities.

Deviations from Sample Design
None reported

Response Rate
The survey sampled 12,800 households out of which 12787 responded to the questionnaire, thus achieving a response rate of 99.9%. The sample population enumerated through the survey was 49,948.

Weighting
The design weights are used to compensate for differences in the selection probabilities. The weight for the PSU is inversely proportional to its selection probability.
See the details information on the sample weighting in Appendix 3 of Main Report that is attached as an external resourse.

Data Collection

Data Collection Dates

Start End Cycle
2002-10-01 2002-12-31 First quarter
2003-01-01 2003-03-31 Second quarter
2003-04-01 2003-06-30 Third quarter
2003-07-01 2003-09-30 Fourth quarter

Data Collection Mode

Face-to-face [f2f]

DATA COLLECTION NOTES


Trained enumerators and supervisors collected data through face to face interviews from sampled households. The collection of data for the 1st Round of the survey was conducted between October -December 2002. The data collection was conducted on the 2nd Round between January-March 2003 and the 3rd Round during April -June 2003. The data collection on the 4th and final Round was undertaken during July- September 2003. Considering the workload involved and the time taken to retrieve the completed questionnaires from the field, each interviewer was entrusted with the task of canvassing data from 50 to 60 households in 5 or 6 sampled baghs (EA). As the LFS was designed as a quarterly survey much of the field work on the survey was concentrated in the 2nd month of the quarter. Considering the widespread migration of herdsman in the rural areas, it was decided to visit households 2-3 times. These safeguards made it possible to obtain completed responses from 12,787 sampled households in the all 4 Rounds of the survey.
Centralized training of field staff was undertaken for the first time in the LFS in any large-scale survey undertaken by the NSO. A comprehensive manual was prepared which embodied detailed instructions on how to admit the questionnaire and conduct the interviews and the concepts and definitions used in the survey were described in the manual. In cooperation with International Consultants, the NSO WG conducted a centralized training for enumerators and supervisors during the 6th October to 13th October, 2002 in Ulaanbaatar. During the training, under the guidance of WG, the enumerators and supervisors field tested the questionnaire in two districts of Ulaanbaatar city: Khan-Uul and Chingeltei.
Before finalizing the survey instruments, two pre-tests of the LFS, questionnaire and instructions for field operations were conducted in April and July 2002 by the WG of the NSO. The results of the pre-tests were discussed with the Working Group and some modifications in the wording and skip instructions were incorporated. The pre-tests were useful in preparing the draft questionnaire that was submitted to the users for their observations. The 2nd field test was conducted after obtaining the observations of the users and incorporating their suggestions. The 2nd test was useful in identifying a number of deficiencies in the questionnaire. The questionnaire was modified on the basis of the findings, modifications related to the wording of questions, changes in skip instructions, changes in response categories and codes.

Data Collectors

Name Abbreviation Affiliation
National Statistical Office of Mongolia   NSO

SUPERVISION


In each district a team of people was selected – one supervisor for the district, controllers (one controller per 5-6 interviewers) and interviewers (whose number depended on the number of clusters in the region). Coordinator provided overall supervision.
To ensure data quality the LFS and NSO management travelled to 13 aimags and Ulaanbaatar city to monitory the LFS data collection and provide instructions on further proper and due implementation of the survey. The mobilization of NSO staff attached to Provincial Statistical Bureaus had a positive impact as the statistical skills were upgraded through training and exposure to survey methodology including statistical concepts and definitions, classification and coding systems and cartographic work.

Data Processing

Data Editing
The data processing of LFS was organized at two levels. Data editing and validation, computer processing and preparation of tabulations being undertaken centrally at the NSO, while manual editing and coding, key entry and verification were undertaken at the provincial level. Checking the completeness of questionnaires, coding of questionnaires, range edit checks, simple consistency edits and electronic transfer of the keyed in data to the NSO were undertaken at the provincial level. The NSO computer staff were familiar with the IMPS software developed by the US Bureau of the Census and this software had been used both in population census and survey processing. Thus, LFS data entry programmes were prepared using IMPS and for range and consistency checks the CONCOR module was used.

Other Processing
For tabulation process used SPSS. After data processing the WG together with the Consultant made statistical analysis on selected indicators, compared some results with the ones of other surveys and census, data consolidation, error corrections etc. were undertaken. The sampling errors of selected estimates were computed using CENVAR module in the IMPS package.

Data Appraisal

Estimates of Sampling Error


As in any sample survey, the results obtained from the LFS are subject to sampling and non-sampling errors. The non-sampling errors arise as a result of imperfections in data collection, data processing and dissemination. These include errors that are introduced at the preparatory stage; errors committed during data collection including those committed by interviewers and respondents; and processing errors. In order to reduce these non-sampling errors several safeguards were adopted. Careful design of survey instruments, training and supervision of LFS staff deployed in data collection and processing, efficient operating procedures in data cleaning and data management, checking consistency and completeness of the tables that were extracted were some of the more important methods and procedures that were used in the survey. However it is known that non-sampling errors would be the major source of errors in the survey results, not withstanding the measures that were adopted in survey design and implementation. In view of the impracticality of measuring non-sampling errors, the total error calculation in surveys is restricted to calculation of sampling errors.

Sampling errors in surveys occur as a result of limiting the survey observations to a subset rather than the whole population. These errors are related to the sample size selected and sampling design adopted in the survey. In order to maintain these errors within acceptable levels, the efficient sampling design with the sample allocation described in Annex 3 (refer to the external resource of Chapter 12 of the Main report for more information) was adopted.

The sampling error indicates the extent to which an estimate from the survey would vary by chance, because only a sample of enumeration areas is included rather than all the enumeration areas into which the country is divided. The sample size and survey design had determined the magnitude of the sampling errors and in respect of some items the sampling errors were known to be high at the design stage of the survey.

IMPS package that was developed by the US Bureau of the Census was used in processing data from the LFS +CAM. Therefore, it was decided to use CENVAR which is the variance calculation module of the IMPS package to compute sampling errors of key aggregates from the survey. For each specified parameter and domain of estimation, CENVAR produces a tabulated output that provides the following measures.
- the estimated value of the parameter
- the standard error
- the coefficient of variation
- the 95 percent confidence interval
- the design effect (DEFF) and
- the number of observations upon which the estimate is based

It is common to allow an interval of either 2 standard errors or 1.6 standard errors in either direction around an estimate from a given sample as the possible range of sampling error. Under the 2 standard error criterion, the population value as estimated from the sample falls within the indicated range in 95 cases out of 100. Under the 1.6 standard error criterion, the probability drops to 90 cases out of 100 but this is still a reasonable basis for judgment for many analytical purposes. Estimates of sampling errors computed using CENVAR have 95 confidence intervals of 2 standard errors. The sampling errors of key aggregates are provided in Tables 84-91 (refer to the external resource of Chapter 12 of the Main report for more information).

As described in the users guide, CENVAR is designed for the calculation of the variances and uses formulae appropriate for stratified multistage sampling designs. The details of the two stage stratified sampling design used in the LFS +CAM including the stratification into 9 strata and sampling weights had been defined as required by the CENVAR system at the stage when variables corresponding to the sample design were specified. However, certain aspects of the sampling design such as the strong implicit stratification by aimag (province) soum( district) built in to the sampling design through the adoption of stratified circular systematic random sampling could not be specified in the CENVAR system. Thus, the sampling errors computed using the program and produced in the attached tables would probably overstate the width of the actual or true confidence intervals of parameters as well as the design effects of the sampling design.

Other forms of Data Appraisal
10 households were to be selected from every sample enumeration area in all strata in each Quarter, but due to non-response/ absence of sampled households the enumerated number was less than 10 households in a few enumeration areas.

 

file name

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 49948

Width: 6

Type: character

Range:

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 49948

Width: 8

Type: character

Range:

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 49948

Width: 4

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 1280

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 49948

Width: 2

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 22

Value Category Cases

1


Arkhangai

1619



3.24%

2


Bayan-ulgii

2434



4.87%

3


Bayankhongor

1354



2.71%

4


Bulgan

1174



2.35%

5


Govi-altai

1453



2.91%

6


Dornogovi

1040



2.08%

7


Dornod

2802



5.61%

8


Dundgovi

1287



2.58%

9


Zavkhan

2170



4.34%

10


Uvurkhangai

1939



3.88%

11


Umnugovi

1037



2.08%

12


Sukhbaatar

2642



5.29%

13


Selenge

2043



4.09%

14


Tuv

2162



4.33%

15


Uvs

2103



4.21%

16


Hovd

2248



4.5%

17


Huvsgul

2048



4.1%

18


Hentii

3192



6.39%

19


Darkhan-uul

1497



3%

20


Ulaanbaatar

12232



24.49%

21


Orkhon

1226



2.45%

22


Govi-sumber

246



0.49%

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 49948

Width: 2

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 27

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 49948

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 4

Value Category Cases

1


Capital city

12232



24.49%

2


Center of aimag

12382



24.79%

3


Center of soum

9688



19.4%

4


Rural

15646



31.32%

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 49948

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 4

Value Category Cases

1


Quarter- I

12530



25.09%

2


Quarter- II

12405



24.84%

3


Quarter- III

12541



25.11%

4


Quarter -IV

12472



24.97%

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 49948

Width: 2

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 13

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 49948

Width: 2

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 13

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 49948

Width: 2

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 11

Value Category Cases

1


Head

12787



25.6%

2


Husband /wife

9322



18.66%

3


Son/ daughter

24061



48.17%

4


Parents

551



1.1%

5


Brother/sister

997



2%

6


Parent in law

67



0.13%

7


Son/daughter in law

248



0.5%

8


Grandparents

40



0.08%

9


Grandchild

1568



3.14%

10


Other relative

300



0.6%

11


Non relative

7



0.01%

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 49948

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 2

Value Category Cases

1


Male

24880



49.81%

2


Female

25068



50.19%

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 49948

Width: 4

Type: numeric

Range: 1886 - 2003

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 49948

Width: 2

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 12

Value Category Cases

1


4081



8.17%

2


4160



8.33%

3


4922



9.85%

4


4477



8.96%

5


4357



8.72%

6


3984



7.98%

7


4428



8.87%

8


3892



7.79%

9


3712



7.43%

10


4103



8.21%

11


3838



7.68%

12


3994



8%

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 49948

Width: 2

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 31

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 49948

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 104

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45793

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 3

Value Category Cases

1


Currently attending

13193



28.81%

2


Attended

28439



62.1%

3


Newer attended

4161



9.09%

Sysmiss


4155


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 41563

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 7

Value Category Cases

1


None

4169



10.03%

2


Primary

10651



25.63%

3


Incomplete secondary

10094



24.29%

4


Completed secondary

7942



19.11%

5


Initial technical/vocational diploma/certification

1807



4.35%

6


Technical /vocational diploma/certification

3157



7.6%

7


University grade

3743



9.01%

Sysmiss


8385


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 6499

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 2

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

4951



76.18%

2


No

1548



23.82%

Sysmiss


43449


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 34443

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 6

Value Category Cases

1


Never married

11334



32.91%

2


Married

19632



57%

3


Living together

224



0.65%

4


Separated

292



0.85%

5


Divorced

700



2.03%

6


Widowed

2261



6.56%

Sysmiss


15505


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45793

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 3

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

40838



89.18%

2


Household head/adult member

4845



10.58%

3


None

110



0.24%

Sysmiss


4155


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 160

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 112

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 140

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 94

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 112

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 120

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 112

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 77

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 112

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 86

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 84

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 84

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 110

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 160

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 68

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 68

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 60

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 98

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 72

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 72

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 72

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 60

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 120

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 120

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 90

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 75

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 164

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 160

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 26663

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 2

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

1257



4.71%

2


No

25406



95.29%

Sysmiss


23285


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 20277

Width: 4

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 9999

Value Category Cases

1110


1



0%

1120


22



0.11%

1130


116



0.57%

1141


6



0.03%

1142


15



0.07%

1143


11



0.05%

1210


147



0.72%

1211


31



0.15%

1221


4



0.02%

1222


25



0.12%

1223


4



0.02%

1224


37



0.18%

1225


7



0.03%

1226


12



0.06%

1227


13



0.06%

1228


1



0%

1229


64



0.32%

1231


18



0.09%

1232


6



0.03%

1233


27



0.13%

1234


3



0.01%

1235


3



0.01%

1236


3



0.01%

1239


25



0.12%

1311


6



0.03%

1312


1



0%

1313


4



0.02%

1314


17



0.08%

1315


16



0.08%

1316


8



0.04%

1317


17



0.08%

1318


4



0.02%

1319


10



0.05%

1410


26



0.13%

2111


10



0.05%

2112


52



0.26%

2113


11



0.05%

2114


5



0.02%

2121


3



0.01%

2122


10



0.05%

2131


13



0.06%

2132


8



0.04%

2139


2



0.01%

2141


18



0.09%

2142


23



0.11%

2143


26



0.13%

2144


18



0.09%

2145


28



0.14%

2146


12



0.06%

2147


18



0.09%

2148


12



0.06%

2149


8



0.04%

2211


5



0.02%

2212


21



0.1%

2213


6



0.03%

2221


181



0.89%

2222


9



0.04%

2223


33



0.16%

2224


16



0.08%

2229


33



0.16%

2230


123



0.61%

2310


108



0.53%

2320


401



1.98%

2331


122



0.6%

2332


84



0.41%

2340


25



0.12%

2351


48



0.24%

2352


1



0%

2359


27



0.13%

2411


273



1.35%

2412


19



0.09%

2419


10



0.05%

2421


50



0.25%

2422


9



0.04%

2429


34



0.17%

2431


6



0.03%

2432


20



0.1%

2441


39



0.19%

2442


2



0.01%

2443


4



0.02%

2444


7



0.03%

2446


24



0.12%

2447


9



0.04%

2449


19



0.09%

2451


57



0.28%

2452


19



0.09%

2453


24



0.12%

2454


7



0.03%

2455


13



0.06%

2460


11



0.05%

3111


19



0.09%

3112


13



0.06%

3113


13



0.06%

3114


12



0.06%

3115


4



0.02%

3116


2



0.01%

3117


4



0.02%

3118


1



0%

3121


5



0.02%

3122


4



0.02%

3123


9



0.04%

3131


29



0.14%

3132


7



0.03%

3139


2



0.01%

3141


1



0%

3143


7



0.03%

3144


1



0%

3145


2



0.01%

3151


3



0.01%

3152


6



0.03%

3211


5



0.02%

3212


12



0.06%

3213


3



0.01%

3221


54



0.27%

3222


5



0.02%

3223


2



0.01%

3225


1



0%

3226


5



0.02%

3227


2



0.01%

3228


8



0.04%

3229


28



0.14%

3231


112



0.55%

3232


7



0.03%

3241


2



0.01%

3310


33



0.16%

3320


50



0.25%

3330


14



0.07%

3340


57



0.28%

3411


9



0.04%

3416


63



0.31%

3417


6



0.03%

3419


8



0.04%

3421


1



0%

3422


1



0%

3429


7



0.03%

3431


13



0.06%

3432


9



0.04%

3433


5



0.02%

3434


2



0.01%

3439


32



0.16%

3441


16



0.08%

3442


33



0.16%

3443


17



0.08%

3449


10



0.05%

3450


52



0.26%

3460


10



0.05%

3471


13



0.06%

3472


7



0.03%

3473


5



0.02%

3475


5



0.02%

3480


11



0.05%

4111


24



0.12%

4112


10



0.05%

4114


2



0.01%

4115


7



0.03%

4121


9



0.04%

4122


4



0.02%

4131


119



0.59%

4132


27



0.13%

4133


20



0.1%

4134


13



0.06%

4141


7



0.03%

4142


10



0.05%

4143


2



0.01%

4144


18



0.09%

4190


3



0.01%

4211


24



0.12%

4212


7



0.03%

4213


7



0.03%

4214


3



0.01%

4215


12



0.06%

4221


1



0%

4222


1



0%

4223


44



0.22%

5111


13



0.06%

5112


77



0.38%

5113


4



0.02%

5121


69



0.34%

5122


256



1.26%

5123


56



0.28%

5124


17



0.08%

5131


7



0.03%

5132


20



0.1%

5139


7



0.03%

5141


57



0.28%

5149


6



0.03%

5151


4



0.02%

5152


3



0.01%

5161


30



0.15%

5162


25



0.12%

5163


8



0.04%

5169


133



0.66%

5220


423



2.09%

5230


885



4.36%

5490


45



0.22%

6111


277



1.37%

6112


40



0.2%

6113


1



0%

6114


1



0%

6121


9860



48.63%

6122


5



0.02%

6123


3



0.01%

6124


1



0%

6129


11



0.05%

6141


20



0.1%

6142


2



0.01%

6151


1



0%

6152


1



0%

6154


3



0.01%

6210


6



0.03%

7111


155



0.76%

7112


2



0.01%

7113


18



0.09%

7121


20



0.1%

7122


35



0.17%

7123


23



0.11%

7124


50



0.25%

7129


15



0.07%

7131


1



0%

7133


18



0.09%

7135


2



0.01%

7136


105



0.52%

7137


26



0.13%

7141


37



0.18%

7142


17



0.08%

7143


3



0.01%

7211


20



0.1%

7212


34



0.17%

7213


3



0.01%

7214


1



0%

7215


2



0.01%

7216


8



0.04%

7221


13



0.06%

7222


2



0.01%

7223


1



0%

7224


3



0.01%

7231


13



0.06%

7232


19



0.09%

7233


6



0.03%

7241


112



0.55%

7242


2



0.01%

7243


13



0.06%

7244


29



0.14%

7245


56



0.28%

7311


2



0.01%

7313


10



0.05%

7321


2



0.01%

7322


1



0%

7331


2



0.01%

7332


26



0.13%

7341


5



0.02%

7343


4



0.02%

7344


6



0.03%

7345


1



0%

7346


4



0.02%

7411


32



0.16%

7412


71



0.35%

7413


1



0%

7414


2



0.01%

7415


6



0.03%

7421


18



0.09%

7422


86



0.42%

7431


1



0%

7432


39



0.19%

7433


6



0.03%

7435


5



0.02%

7436


197



0.97%

7441


10



0.05%

7442


26



0.13%

8111


3



0.01%

8112


9



0.04%

8113


5



0.02%

8139


8



0.04%

8152


2



0.01%

8161


13



0.06%

8162


108



0.53%

8163


3



0.01%

8171


2



0.01%

8211


2



0.01%

8212


1



0%

8221


1



0%

8222


1



0%

8223


35



0.17%

8231


1



0%

8232


2



0.01%

8251


1



0%

8262


2



0.01%

8263


6



0.03%

8266


1



0%

8271


2



0.01%

8273


1



0%

8274


1



0%

8275


1



0%

8278


5



0.02%

8281


1



0%

8282


3



0.01%

8283


1



0%

8290


17



0.08%

8311


31



0.15%

8312


54



0.27%

8321


8



0.04%

8322


596



2.94%

8323


11



0.05%

8324


215



1.06%

8331


49



0.24%

8332


3



0.01%

8333


7



0.03%

8334


4



0.02%

9111


52



0.26%

9112


155



0.76%

9113


10



0.05%

9120


3



0.01%

9131


5



0.02%

9132


118



0.58%

9133


7



0.03%

9141


157



0.77%

9142


4



0.02%

9151


34



0.17%

9152


160



0.79%

9153


74



0.36%

9161


15



0.07%

9162


3



0.01%

9211


134



0.66%

9212


25



0.12%

9213


5



0.02%

9311


19



0.09%

9312


28



0.14%

9313


12



0.06%

9314


11



0.05%

9321


1



0%

9322


30



0.15%

9331


2



0.01%

9332


3



0.01%

9333


50



0.25%

9999


1



0%

Sysmiss


29671


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 20277

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 5

Value Category Cases

1


Less than 1 year

1871



9.23%

2


1 to 2 years

1993



9.83%

3


3 to 4 years

3034



14.96%

4


5 to 9 years

4576



22.57%

5


10 years or more

8803



43.41%

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 20277

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 990

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 20277

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 7

Value Category Cases

1


Paid employee on contract

6621



32.65%

2


Paid employee under civil law

546



2.69%

3


Employer

115



0.57%

4


Member of cooperative

42



0.21%

5


Own account worker

7125



35.14%

6


Unpaid family worker

5804



28.62%

7


Other

24



0.12%

Sysmiss


29671


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 20277

Width: 2

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 70

Value Category Cases

10


Private enterprice

688



3.39%

11


Partnership

53



0.26%

21


Cooperative

111



0.55%

31


Joint state and private company

808



3.98%

32


Limited liability company

1668



8.23%

40


State industry

665



3.28%

50


Government enterprice

3739



18.44%

60


Non-profit organization

272



1.34%

70


Self-employed

12273



60.53%

Sysmiss


29671


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 160

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 20277

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 4

Value Category Cases

1


No regular employees

12306



60.69%

2


1 to 4 paid employees

1156



5.7%

3


5 to 9 paid employees

727



3.59%

4


10 or more paid employees

6088



30.02%

Sysmiss


29671


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 20277

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 2

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

450



2.22%

2


No

19827



97.78%

Sysmiss


29671


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 19827

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 2

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

83



0.42%

2


No

19744



99.58%

Sysmiss


30121


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 533

Width: 4

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 9999

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 32927

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 148

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 533

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 5

Value Category Cases

1


Less than 1 year

170



31.89%

2


1 to 2 years

109



20.45%

3


3 to 4 years

98



18.39%

4


5 to 9 years

86



16.14%

5


10 years or more

70



13.13%

Sysmiss


49415


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 533

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 990

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 533

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 7

Value Category Cases

1


Paid employee on contract

61



11.44%

2


Paid employee under civil law

37



6.94%

3


Employer

10



1.88%

4


Member of cooperative

2



0.38%

5


Own account worker

309



57.97%

6


Unpaid family worker

104



19.51%

7


Other

10



1.88%

Sysmiss


49415


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 533

Width: 2

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 70

Value Category Cases

10


Private enterprise

17



3.19%

11


Partnership

6



1.13%

21


Cooperative

7



1.31%

31


Joint state and private company

8



1.5%

32


Limited liability company

29



5.44%

40


States industry

3



0.56%

50


Government enterprise

52



9.76%

60


Non-profit organization

17



3.19%

70


Self-employed

394



73.92%

Sysmiss


49415


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 533

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 4

Value Category Cases

1


No regular employees

400



75.05%

2


1 to 4 paid employees

34



6.38%

3


4 to 9 paid employees

21



3.94%

4


10 or more paid employees

78



14.63%

Sysmiss


49415


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 7042

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 7

Value Category Cases

1


Hourly

72



1.02%

2


Daily

114



1.62%

3


Weekly

17



0.24%

4


Every 15 days

3321



47.16%

5


Monthly

3347



47.53%

6


Quarterly

41



0.58%

7


Piece rate basis

130



1.85%

Sysmiss


42906


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 26264

Width: 7

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 42000

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 26264

Width: 7

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 35

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 26264

Width: 7

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 120

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 26264

Width: 7

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 30

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 20277

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 8

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

1350



6.66%

2


Have sufficient work

17071



84.19%

3


Housekeeping duties

1361



6.71%

4


Student/following unpaid training

99



0.49%

5


Temporary ailment/sickness

58



0.29%

6


Vacation/off season

49



0.24%

7


Pregnant/caring for infant child

95



0.47%

8


Other

194



0.96%

Sysmiss


29671


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 1350

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 6

Value Category Cases

1


Can not find more work

1045



77.41%

2


Off season inactivity/bad weather

69



5.11%

3


Machinery, electrical or other breakdown

8



0.59%

4


Short of raw material or fuel etc

21



1.56%

5


Shortage of finds/resources

136



10.07%

6


Other

71



5.26%

Sysmiss


48598


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 1350

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 6

Value Category Cases

1


Less than 1 month

65



4.81%

2


1 to 2 months

104



7.7%

3


3 to 6 months

221



16.37%

4


7 to 11 months

91



6.74%

5


1 to 2 years

324



24%

6


3 or more years

545



40.37%

Sysmiss


48598


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 20277

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 8

Value Category Cases

1


Registered at ero

34



0.17%

2


Searched and responded to job advertisements

95



0.47%

3


Applied to prospective employers

64



0.32%

4


Checked at farms, factors, work sites etc

66



0.33%

5


Sought help from friends or relatives

305



1.5%

6


Looked for land, equipment, finance to set up own enterprise

148



0.73%

7


“not searched for more work “

19565



96.49%

8


Other

0



96.49%

Sysmiss


29671


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 25406

Width: 2

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 11

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

3335



13.13%

2


Household duties

1449



5.7%

3


Studies

11626



45.76%

4


Retired

3030



11.93%

5


Old age

386



1.52%

6


Disability

628



2.47%

7


Not available for work

246



0.97%

8


Looking after children

568



2.24%

9


Temporary ailment sickness

371



1.46%

10


Person below working age

2878



11.33%

11


Other

889



3.5%

Sysmiss


24542


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 3335

Width: 4

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 9999

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 35486

Width: 7

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 550

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 35486

Width: 7

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 200

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 3335

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 2

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

756



22.67%

2


No

2579



77.33%

Sysmiss


46613


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 756

Width: 6

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 200308

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 3335

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 2

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

1383



41.47%

2


No

1952



58.53%

Sysmiss


46613


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 1383

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 7

Value Category Cases

1


Registered at employment registration office,

158



11.42%

2


Searched and responded to job advertisements

274



19.81%

3


Applied to prospective employers

117



8.46%

4


checked at farms, factories, work sites etc

340



24.58%

5


Sought help from friends or relatives

430



31.09%

6


Looked for land, equipment, finance to set up own enterprise

43



3.11%

7


Other steps taken

21



1.52%

Sysmiss


48565


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 1952

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 9

Value Category Cases

1


Thought no work available

1403



71.88%

2


Off season

125



6.4%

3


Has no skilss or training

53



2.72%

4


Household duties

86



4.41%

5


Studies

23



1.18%

6


Not available

53



2.72%

7


Person below working age

2



0.1%

8


Retired

19



0.97%

9


Other

188



9.63%

Sysmiss


47996


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 1383

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 6

Value Category Cases

1


Less than 1 month

26



1.88%

2


1 to 2 months

62



4.48%

3


3 to 6 months

114



8.24%

4


7 to 11 months

69



4.99%

5


1 to 2 years

365



26.39%

6


3 or more

747



54.01%

Sysmiss


48565


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 45683

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 2

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

21837



47.8%

2


No

23846



52.2%

Sysmiss


4265


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 23846

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 9

Value Category Cases

1


Studies

12300



51.58%

2


Household duties

1575



6.6%

3


Income recipient

115



0.48%

4


Retired/old age

3431



14.39%

5


Illness

439



1.84%

6


Disabled

663



2.78%

7


Taking care of child

675



2.83%

8


Too young to work

2995



12.56%

9


Other

1653



6.93%

Sysmiss


26102


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 21837

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 2

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

19721



90.31%

2


No

2116



9.69%

Sysmiss


28111


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 2116

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 7

Value Category Cases

1


Registered at ero

258



12.19%

2


Searched and responded to job advertisements

316



14.93%

3


Applied to prospective employers

166



7.84%

4


Checked at farms, factors, work sites etc

418



19.75%

5


Sought help from friends or relatives

831



39.27%

6


Looked for land, equipment, finance to set up own enterprise

125



5.91%

7


Other

2



0.09%

Sysmiss


47832


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 2116

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 6

Value Category Cases

1


Less than 3 months

17



0.8%

2


3 to 6 months

57



2.69%

3


7 to 11 months

39



1.84%

4


1 to 2 years

926



43.76%

5


3 to 4 years

469



22.16%

6


5 or more years

608



28.73%

Sysmiss


47832


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 19834

Width: 4

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 9999

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 19834

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 990

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 19834

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 5

Value Category Cases

1


Less than 1 year

1563



7.88%

2


1 to 2 years

1981



9.99%

3


3 to 4 years

2906



14.65%

4


5 to 9 years

4551



22.95%

5


10 years or more

8833



44.53%

Sysmiss


30114


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 19834

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 7

Value Category Cases

1


Paid employee on contract

6648



33.52%

2


Paid employee under civil law

547



2.76%

3


Employer

157



0.79%

4


Member of cooperative

37



0.19%

5


Own account worker

6556



33.05%

6


Unpaid family worker

5841



29.45%

7


Other

48



0.24%

Sysmiss


30114


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 32697

Width: 7

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 5000

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 32697

Width: 7

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 35

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 19834

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 2

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

618



3.12%

2


No

19216



96.88%

Sysmiss


30114


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 618

Width: 4

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 9999

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 618

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 990

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 618

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 7

Value Category Cases

1


Paid employee on contract

56



9.06%

2


Paid employee under civil law

54



8.74%

3


Employer

10



1.62%

4


Member of cooperative

2



0.32%

5


Own account worker

357



57.77%

6


Unpaid family worker

128



20.71%

7


Other

11



1.78%

Sysmiss


49330


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 32697

Width: 7

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 5000

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 32697

Width: 7

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 35

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 32697

Width: 2

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 6

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 25849

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 2

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

7399



28.62%

2


No

18450



71.38%

Sysmiss


24099


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 7399

Width: 4

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 9422

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 7399

Width: 3

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 990

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 7399

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 5

Value Category Cases

1


Less than 1 year

406



5.49%

2


1 to 2 years

521



7.04%

3


3 to 4 years

741



10.01%

4


5 to 9 years

1030



13.92%

5


10 years or more

4701



63.54%

Sysmiss


42549


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 7399

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 7

Value Category Cases

1


Paid employee on contract

5691



76.92%

2


Paid employee under civil law

290



3.92%

3


Employer

235



3.18%

4


Member of cooperative

257



3.47%

5


Own account worker

665



8.99%

6


Unpaid family worker

203



2.74%

7


Other

58



0.78%

Sysmiss


42549


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 7399

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 6

Value Category Cases

1


Less than 1 month

101



1.37%

2


1 to 3 months

143



1.93%

3


4 to 6 months

306



4.14%

4


7 to 11 months

221



2.99%

5


1 to 2 years

1065



14.39%

6


3 or more years

5563



75.19%

Sysmiss


42549


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 7399

Width: 2

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 70

Value Category Cases

10


Private enterprise

84



1.14%

11


Partnership

19



0.26%

21


Cooperative

460



6.22%

31


Joint state and private company

701



9.47%

32


Limited liability company

753



10.18%

40


State industry

1737



23.48%

50


Government enterprise

2755



37.23%

60


Non-profit organization

108



1.46%

70


Self-employed

782



10.57%

Sysmiss


42549


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 7399

Width: 2

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 10

Value Category Cases

1


Personally/family reasons

959



12.96%

2


Dissatisfied with pay

113



1.53%

3


Dissatisfied with work

66



0.89%

4


Illness/disability

593



8.01%

5


Retired

3181



42.99%

6


Study

73



0.99%

7


Temporary seasesation of work

118



1.59%

8


Organization closure

1047



14.15%

9


Laid off

844



11.41%

10


Other

405



5.47%

Sysmiss


42549


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 7399

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 8

Value Category Cases

1


Parent, spouse, children, brother/sisters

3402



45.98%

2


Withdrawal from savings

11



0.15%

3


Income from property

270



3.65%

4


Sale of assets

22



0.3%

5


Government

196



2.65%

6


Charitable institutions

10



0.14%

7


Pensions/benefits

2968



40.11%

8


Other

520



7.03%

Sysmiss


42549


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 3041

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 8

Value Category Cases

1


Parent, spouse, children, brother/sisters

1065



35.02%

2


Withdrawal from savings

22



0.72%

3


Income from property

140



4.6%

4


Sale of assets

18



0.59%

5


Government

162



5.33%

6


Charitable institutions

33



1.09%

7


Pensions/benefits

707



23.25%

8


Other

894



29.4%

Sysmiss


46907


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 585

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 8

Value Category Cases

1


Parent, spouse, children, brother/sisters

61



10.43%

2


Withdrawal from savings

11



1.88%

3


Income from property

16



2.74%

4


Sale of assets

5



0.85%

5


Government

28



4.79%

6


Charitable institutions

5



0.85%

7


Pensions/benefits

19



3.25%

8


Other

440



75.21%

Sysmiss


49363


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 15122

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 3

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

13488



89.19%

2


Household head/adult member

1606



10.62%

3


None

28



0.19%

Sysmiss


34826


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 15094

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 3

Value Category Cases

1


Formal

11079



73.4%

2


Non-formal

72



0.48%

3


No

3943



26.12%

Sysmiss


34854


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 3943

Width: 2

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 9

Value Category Cases

1


Under-aged

2543



64.49%

2


School too far

63



1.6%

3


Cost of school materials, clothing etc

192



4.87%

4


Poor performance in studies/not interested in studies

261



6.62%

5


Add to household income

188



4.77%

6


Help with household duties

356



9.03%

7


Sick

140



3.55%

8


Disabled

64



1.62%

9


Others

136



3.45%

Sysmiss


46005


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 15094

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 2

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

6998



46.36%

2


No

8096



53.64%

Sysmiss


34854


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 6998

Width: 2

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 17

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 6998

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 5

Value Category Cases

1


Gain work experience and skilss

535



7.65%

2


Help parents

6020



86.02%

3


Shortage or family labour

352



5.03%

4


Forced by parents

58



0.83%

5


Others

33



0.47%

Sysmiss


42950


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 15094

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 2

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

300



1.99%

2


No

14794



98.01%

Sysmiss


34854


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 300

Width: 2

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 17

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 300

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 6

Value Category Cases

1


Gain work experience and skilss

67



22.33%

2


Contribute to household income

152



50.67%

3


Support self/be economically independent

11



3.67%

4


Earn to cover cost of schooling

16



5.33%

5


Child wants to work

54



18%

6


Others

0



18%

Sysmiss


49648


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 300

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 8

Value Category Cases

1


Employer's home

100



33.33%

2


On the street

5



1.67%

3


Shops/market place

40



13.33%

4


Factory/industry premises

6



2%

5


Pasture/farming land, garden

115



38.33%

6


Mining site

11



3.67%

7


Construction site

7



2.33%

8


Other

16



5.33%

Sysmiss


49648


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 300

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 2

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

33



11%

2


No

267



89%

Sysmiss


49648


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 33

Width: 2

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 17

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 300

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 3

Value Category Cases

1


Relative adult

231



77%

2


Non-relative adult

29



9.67%

3


By self or without supervision

40



13.33%

Sysmiss


49648


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 300

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 2

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

269



89.67%

2


No

31



10.33%

Sysmiss


49648


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 31

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 6

Value Category Cases

1


Exposure to cold weather

14



45.16%

2


Exposure to dust/water

4



12.9%

3


Exposure to noise

2



6.45%

4


Exposure to harmful substances

2



6.45%

5


Bad posture

0



6.45%

6


Other

9



29.03%

Sysmiss


49917


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 300

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 2

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

3



1%

2


No

297



99%

Sysmiss


49648


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 3

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 7

Value Category Cases

1


Verbal abuse

1



33.33%

2


Uncaring attitude

0



33.33%

3


Beaten at work

0



33.33%

4


Sexual harassment

0



33.33%

5


Heavy physical work

0



33.33%

6


Being robbed of earnings

1



33.33%

7


Other

1



33.33%

Sysmiss


49945


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 2

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 7

Value Category Cases

1


Verbal abuse

1



50%

2


Uncaring attitude

0



50%

3


Beaten at work

0



50%

4


Sexual harassment

0



50%

5


Heavy physical work

0



50%

6


Being robbed of earnings

0



50%

7


Other

1



50%

Sysmiss


49946


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 1

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 7

Value Category Cases

1


Verbal abuse

0



2497300%

2


Uncaring attitude

1



100%

3


Beaten at work

0



100%

4


Sexual harassment

0



100%

5


Heavy physical work

0



100%

6


Being robbed of earnings

0



100%

7


Other

0



100%

Sysmiss


49947


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 300

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 2

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

88



29.33%

2


No

212



70.67%

Sysmiss


49648


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 300

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 4

Value Category Cases

1


Newer

241



80.33%

2


1-3 times

41



13.67%

3


4-7 times

9



3%

4


8 or more

9



3%

Sysmiss


49648


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 300

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 2

Value Category Cases

1


Yes

4



1.33%

2


No

296



98.67%

Sysmiss


49648


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 4

Width: 4

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 6121

Value Category Cases

5230


1



25%

6121


3



75%

Sysmiss


49944


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 4

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 6

Value Category Cases

1


No treatment required

0



1248600%

2


Consulted medical doctor

2



50%

3


Required hospitalization

1



25%

4


Temporarily on capacitated

1



25%

5


Disabled

0



25%

6


Other

0



25%

Sysmiss


49944


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 4

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 8

Value Category Cases

1


Not seriously sick/injuryd

1



25%

2


Developed allergy

0



25%

3


Contacted eye infection/eyesight affected

0



25%

4


Lung infection

0



25%

5


Cardiovascular disorder

0



25%

6


Stomach ailment

0



25%

7


Hepatitis

0



25%

8


Other

3



75%

Sysmiss


49944


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 4

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 6

Value Category Cases

1


Employers

1



25%

2


On medical insurance

0



25%

3


Parents

3



75%

4


By self

0



75%

5


No cost

0



75%

6


Other

0



75%

Sysmiss


49944


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 300

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 5

Value Category Cases

1


Support family

142



47.33%

2


Part to support family and part for self

111



37%

3


Save

1



0.33%

4


Spend all on self

21



7%

5


Other

25



8.33%

Sysmiss


49648


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 300

Width: 1

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 6

Value Category Cases

1


Fall in standard of living of household

88



29.33%

2


Household will not have any source of income

14



4.67%

3


Household business will be affected

16



5.33%

4


Lose work experience

45



15%

5


No impact

124



41.33%

6


Other

13



4.33%

Sysmiss


49648


File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 30334

Width: 2

Type: numeric

Range: 0 - 23

Value Category Cases

1


No free time

15288



50.4%

2


1-2 hours

1509



4.97%

3


3-5 hours

8380



27.63%

4


More than 5 hours

5157



17%

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 49948

Width: 2

Type: numeric

Range: 1 - 13

Value Category Cases

File: LFS 2002-2003.NSDstat

Valid cases: 49948

Width: 7

Type: numeric

Range: 17.18 - 161.96

Value Category Cases

2002-10-5 Manual

   183KB

Appendix-1

   901KB

ddi-documentation-english

   150KB

Graphs

   168KB

LFS cover page

   51KB

LFS in english

   255KB

NCLS FINAL REPORT 2002-2003

   2.1MB

report

   583KB

MAIN REPORT of LFS 2002-2003

   2.6MB

Tables

   2.2MB